The law school for Negroes which was to have opened in February, 1947, would have had no independent faculty or library. Facts. Advertisement Previous Advertisement Cng ty c phn t vn thit k v pht trin cng ngh Vic lm k ton, Fan H Ni xp hng di ch mua album ca Sn Tng M-TP, C nh cho mnh hi vi. Of Texas, A Melting Pot Not Fully Blended. Tuyn k to, Painting A Metal Building With Airless Sprayer, Cty TNHH Truyn Thng Gio Dc v Gii Tr PHAN TH Judges' Journal 43, no. In accordance with these cases, petitioner may claim his full constitutional right: legal education equivalent to that offered by the State to students of other races. No. It appears that the University has been restricted to white students, in accordance with the State law. No. Sweatt vs. Painter. -- "Remembering Heman Sweatt," by University of Texas President Bill Powers. There is also a lengthy bench memorandum from Clark's law clerk (Box B142, folder 1), as . Lawyers for Brown v. Board were sent from the NAACP. It is not clear that this privilege was anything more than was extended to all citizens of the State. "In my opinion, Sweatt v. Painter is one of the most important constitutional law cases in modern times," says Gregory Vincent, a professor of law and vice president of UT's Division of Diversity and Community Engagement. Brown (defendant), one of four children born to Emily and R. B., contested the 1957 will on the ground that R. B., in 2006, had executed a "Revocation of Last Will and Testament" (revocation document) in which R. B. accessed March 01, 2023, Theophilus Shickel Painter was the University of Texas' president at the time. (Andrea Hsu is an All Things Considered producer. On October 6, the Court for the Western District of Oklahoma found those parts of the Oklahoma statute that denied McLaurin admission unconstitutional, and held that the state had a constitutional duty to provide McLaurin with the education he sought as soon as it provided that education for applicants of any other group. 247. O'Gorman & Young, Inc. v. Hartford Fire Insurance Co. Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, Planned Parenthood of Central Missouri v. Danforth, City of Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health, Thornburgh v. American College of Obstetricians & Gynecologists, Ohio v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health, Ayotte v. Planned Parenthood of Northern New England. The Supreme Court case file for McLaurin v. Oklahoma and Sweatt v. Painter includes several drafts of Justice Clark's memorandum to the Conference, conference notes, drafts of Chief Justice Vinson's opinion, and memoranda from law clerks (Box A2, folder 3). Thurgood Marshall argued that separating black students, no matter what the conditions, denied them access to opportunities provided to others. In the Brown case laws establishing racial segregation were deemed unconstitutional. Answers is the place to go to get the answers you need and to ask the questions you want It's very much a part of our existence here. One way the NAACP fought for equality was to supply lawyers for those whose rights were violated. He became a target for pranksters and extremists, often placing his jobs in jeopardy. Linda Browns father wanted the best for her, so he wanted the best-educated school for her. -The Supreme court began ruling on a different question during Brown v Board of Education. The landmark decision of this case was resolved from six separate cases that originated from four states. At that time, there was no law school in Texas which admitted Negroes. Howard Law Journal 47, no. Painter was a pivotal event in the history of The University of Texas School of Law and in the civil rights movement in the United States. The history of the case is laid out in an amicus brief filed by Sweatt's family in the case of Fisher v. Texas, and in a book by Gary M. Lavergne, who today works in the University of Texas Office of Admissions. While the United States Supreme Court ultimately reversed the order, for a few years in the mid 1950s, The Supreme Court is perhaps most well known for the Brown vs. Board of Education decision in 1954. He was denied admission because of the color of his skin and was instead offered admission to a separate law school for blacks. After many discussions and debate later, court case decision not only gave justice to the little girl, but also to the case regarding Jim Crow like Plessy versus Ferguson that faced injustice of the separate but equal which in 1965, the Supreme Court produced a unanimous decision to overturn Plessy vs. Ferguson (Separate Is Not Equal - Brown v. Board of Education). Ferguson this case marked a start down that road towards eliminating that discriminatory doctrine. 1409, 91 L.Ed. This final point was key in the NAACP selection process because their experience with previous plaintiffs was not successful. With such a substantial and significant segment of society excluded, we cannot conclude that the education offered petitioner is substantially equal to that which he would receive if admitted to the University of Texas Law School. This discrimination was noticed by NAACP president and director/counselor of the legal defence and educational fund Jack Greenberg, who argued in favor of the African American employees at Duke power co. This case and McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents, 339 U.S. 637, 70 S.Ct. 44. Painter moved the country closer to full legal equality. Marilyn B. Davis, "Local Approach to the Sweatt Case," Negro History Bulletin 23 (March 1960). His was perhaps the second application of any Black to the University of Texas. Indeed, the Court found it hard to believe that someone who was free to choose either would choose the new school over the Univ. Among other reasons given for the approval of the separate but equal doctrine were that it was simply a recognition of a fundamental and ineradicable difference and that it was reasonable in the context of established customs of the people. Journal of Blacks in Higher Education 54 (Winter 2006/2007): 8897. The 'separate' law school and the college became the Thurgood Marshall School of Law at Texas Southern University (known then as "Texas State University for Negroes"). . At the School of Law of the Texas State University for Negroes, students had access to the Texas Supreme Court library, and several members of the law faculty of the University of Texas School of Law taught classes. The case is Sweatt v. Painter. She went on to become one of the first African American women to sit on the board of regents of Oklahoma State University. For example, following the win with the Gaines case, Lloyd L. Gaines won the right to attend the University of Missouri law school, but he vanished after the Supreme Court's decision and thus prevented a proper resolution of the, The overall analysis of the Sweatt case brought about the success of Brown v. Board of Education. With the help of the NAACP, she sued the school. The University of Oklahoma accepted George McLaurin to its graduate program in education, but separated him from other students. We hold that the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment requires that petitioner be admitted to the University of Texas Law School. The Fourteenth Amendments Equal Protection Clause limits the power of a State to discriminate based on race in professional and graduate educational institutions. He reasoned that the judges would feel more sympathetic to the plaintiffs because they were pursuing careers in law. Civil rights have always been an issue in our government, and according to www.kidzworld.com, after these anti black riots, things eventually led to the development of the The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, and from that, Rosa Parks did not give up her seat on the bus. Case (Spartacus 1).     The strategy shifted after Brown, however, to "direct action"--primarily bus boycotts, sit-ins, freedom rides, and similar movements-- from 1955 to 1965. In a unanimous decision, Chief Justice Vinson, writing for the Court, began the analysis by noting the many differences between the well-established University of Texas Law School, and the newly established law school for African-Americans. . Board of Educationand enforced by the executive branch changed their lives and America forever. From 1936 to 1950 the organization won a number of cases leading to the desegregation of law schools and other professional schools at segregated universities in Mississippi, Maryland, Oklahoma, and Texas. Graduate students, however, were allowed to enroll in undergraduate courses when necessary for their program of work. Our summary is based on their work. Every dollar helps. The court ruled that the state either had to establish an equal facility or admit him. Records utilized by scholars for research contained personal conversation, documents, letters, newspaper articles, and trial transcripts. In addition, the University of Texas Law School had many intangible benefits compared to the new law school, in terms of reputation, experience of the staff, influence of alumni, and prestige. Sweatt v. Painter, 339 U.S. 629 (1950), was a U.S. Supreme Court case that successfully challenged the "separate but equal" doctrine of racial segregation established by the 1896 case Plessy v. Ferguson.The case was influential in the landmark case of Brown v.Board of Education four years later.. With guidance from NAACP lawyers, Lloyd Gaines, applied to the University of Missouri law school. He wanted a separate law school for black students. The Supreme Court unanimously ruled that as a result of McLaurin's segregation he was "handicapped in his pursuit of effective graduate instruction. Moreover, a school for only minorities would eliminate any chance that law students would be able to interact in school with the people with whom they will eventually practice, thereby further harming their careers. It was Plessy which gave southern. 1948, 210 S.W.2d 442. From the UT Student Publications, Inc., Photographs, c. 1895-1985 (CN00323B), The Dolph Briscoe Center for American History, The University of Texas at Austin. Used with permission. Petitioner's application for a writ of error was denied by the Texas Supreme Court. He met all eligibility requirements for admission except for his race. Sweatt v. Painter is a landmark decision that began a robust use of the Equal Protection Clause to stop State governments from disadvantaging people based on race. It has a faculty of five full-time professors; a student body of 23; a library of some 16,500 volumes serviced by a full-time staff; a practice court and legal aid association; and one alumnus who has become a member of the Texas Bar. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc. Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board v. College Savings Bank, Board of Trustees of the University of Alabama v. Garrett, Nevada Department of Human Resources v. Hibbs, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sweatt_v._Painter&oldid=1136264397, United States Supreme Court cases of the Vinson Court, African-American history between emancipation and the civil rights movement, United States school desegregation case law, Articles lacking in-text citations from February 2020, Short description is different from Wikidata, Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 3.0, Segregation as applied to the admissions processes for. c : 102 Ph Vin , B , Long Bin. Brown v. Board of Education was a landmark case that was decided by the Supreme Court of America in 1954. Since the University of Texas adopted a narrow interpretation ofSweatt, black undergraduate students were not admitted. It may be argued that excluding petitioner from that school is no different from excluding white students from the new law school. Separation by color is not equal treatment. This led them to imply the Equal Protection Law that claims no state has the right to deny anyone within the jurisdiction equal protection of the, Writing for the court, Chief Justice Earl Warren argued that the question of whether racially segregated public schools were inherently unequal, and thus beyond the scope of the separate but equal doctrine, could be answered only by considering the effect of segregation itself on public education. Citing the Supreme Courts rulings in Sweat v. Painter (1950), and McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education (1950), which recognized intangible inequalities between African American and all-white schools at the graduate, The NAACP Legal Defense and Education Fund, an independent legal aid group, argues in court on behalf of the NAACP and other civil-rights groups. Following an initial court proceeding, the university offered petitioner enrollment in a new law school specifically for African-American law students. Covid-19: For updates visit the University's Protect Texas Together site. While petitioner's appeal was pending, such a school was made available, but petitioner refused to register therein. (Benoit, 17-19). For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. Finding that the new school offered petitioner 'privileges, advantages, and opportunities for the study of law substantially equivalent to those offered by the State to white students at the University of Texas,' the trial court denied mandamus. Hornsby, Alton Jr. "The 'Colored Branch University' Issue in Texas--Prelude to Sweatt v. Painter." Journal of Negro History 61 (1976), 51-60. No. Heman Sweatt, he says, is a hero and a part of the fabric of the University of Texas at Austin. The selected plaintiff had to be willing to disrupt their lives with constant meetings and court appearances for an extended amount of time, to possibly could include several years. Another key event supporting this issue was in 1954, this case came to the Supreme Court. Cho c nh , c ai np thuyt minh bo co ti chnh nm qua mng cha , sa, Cho c nh The case involved a black man, Heman Marion Sweatt, who was refused admission to the School of Law of the University of Texas, whose president was Theophilus Painter, on the grounds that the Texas State Constitution prohibited integrated education. At the same time the Supreme Court considered theSweattcase, it reviewed the policies of the University of Oklahoma in McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education. Upon suit filed by the applicant, the university tried to set up a separate facility for African-American law students. At the expiration of the six months, in December, 1946, the court denied the writ on the showing that the authorized university officials had adopted an order calling for the opening of a law school for Negroes the following February. Sweatt v. Painter, See also CIVIL RIGHTS. United States Supreme Court Reports, June 5, 1950. In State of Missouri ex rel. Petitioner refused that offer. Marshall would go on to build a case around the idea of intangibles. The jurors debated on the fourteen amendment and on the term separate but equal (Brown v. Board of Education). 836, 846, 92 L.Ed. Signup today for our free newsletter, Especially Texan. But we want to take a moment to remember another landmark case that brought the University of Texas to the Supreme Court 62 years ago. Supreme Court Sweatt v. In 1950, Heman Sweatt, an African American, applied to The University of Texas School of Law. Nor need we reach petitioner's contention that Plessy v. Ferguson should be reexamined in the light of contemporary knowledge respecting the purposes of the Fourteenth Amendment and the effects of racial segregation. Petitioner was denied admission to the state supported University of Texas Law School, solely because he is a Negro and state law forbids the admission of Negroes to that Law School. As the Supreme Court hears a new case involving affirmative action at the University of Texas, some remember a legal battle from 62 years ago that paved the way for Brown v. Board of Education. The Court of Civil Appeals affirmed. Broader issues have been urged for our consideration, but we adhere to the principle of deciding constitutional questions only in the context of the particular case before the Court. One policy called the, Margold Report, planned to bring down the idea of separate but equal by challenging the inequality in publicly funded schools. Under those circumstances, the state actions violated the law. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond fair use, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. 208, the Court, speaking through Chief Justice Hughes, declared that 'petitioner's right was a personal one. This paper will explain the riots and how it shaped our government into providing equal jobs for all races. 629 1950 339 US. We cannot, therefore, agree with respondents that the doctrine of Plessy v. Ferguson, 1896, 163 U.S. 537, 16 S.Ct. Such qualities, to name but a few, include reputation of the faculty, experience of the administration, position and influence of the alumni, standing in the communicty, traditions and prestige. [Argument of Counsel from page 630 intentionally omitted]. They provided an excellent historiographical analysis of NAACPs legal actions conducted during this period. The NAACP also had some success in forcing states to equalize public school funding and to pay teachers in black schools at the same rate as those in white schools. He found attacked segregation in law schools was the most successful. 'Equal protection of the laws is not achieved through indiscriminate imposition of inequalities.' Though that case involved the segregation of the races on a common carrier, the separate but equal doctrine utilized in the case to sanction segregation in that situation was subsequently recognized as applicable in a wide variety of situations, including that of segregation of the White and Black races for public education. Argued April 4, 1950. How does the Brown case differ from Sweatt v. Painter IN Sweatt v. Painter the school in question was segregated but in Brown the school was being de-segregated What was the question raised by both Plessy and Brown Did a separate but equal public facility violate the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment. View Case: Sweatt v. Painter, 339 U.S. 629 (1950) The Board of Education made it difficult for him to do this. Oklahoma State Regents 1950 Rather than admit Heman Sweatt to its law school the state of Texas offered to create a separate program for African Americans. Among those representing him: a lawyer from the NAACP Legal Defense Fund named Thurgood Marshall. The briefs were to be heard from both sides of the case, with the focus being on five fundamental questions. In a response that came several weeks later, Attorney Gen. 1138, 41 L.Ed. This case shows that peoples view point are slowly changing even when discrimination is prevalent; this was not the first time minorities wanted justice for their kids to attend diverse, During the 1900s, it was hard for a black to get a good paying job, male or female. In a surprising decision, the court ruled against Duke Power co. WithSweatt v. PainterandMcLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education, the Supreme Court began to overturn the separate but equal doctrine in public education by requiring graduate and professional schools to admit black students. Heman Marion Sweatt registering for classes in the University of Texas School of Law, Sept. 19, 1950. Opening themselves and family members to harassment by whites who regarded him as a troublemaker and a symbol of racial agitation. This guide is designed to help researchers find materials on the case Sweatt v. Painter, 339 U.S. 629 (1950). It had been sponsored by the National, During the Faircloughs article discussion, one of the key research materials that have rarely received scholarly attention pertains to the legal documents held in the NAACP archive. Facts of the Case. 604. On February 12, 1909, the NAACP, National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, was founded. Prints & Photographs Collection,Heman Sweatt file, This Brown@50 site provides special value for cases in three main respects: (1) the cases . It is difficult to believe that one who had a free choice between these law schools would consider the question close. Absolute equality in treatment was not deemed necessary. Painter case you dont get the critical building block to Brown v. In this lesson lets learn how the Supreme Courts decision in Sweatt v. The NAACPs legal team led by Thurgood Marshall took the case. Painter, 339 U.S. 629 (1950), was a U.S. Supreme Court case that successfully challenged the "separate but equal" doctrine of racial segregation established by the 1896 case Plessy v. Ferguson. It is a case that really helped put one of the final nails in the coffin of state-sponsored segregation and to overturn Plessy v. Ferguson." Heman Sweatt, he says, is a hero and a part of the fabric of the University of Texas at Austin. Therefore, the Equal Protection. Sweatt v. Painter. The NAACP was created in 1909 and stands for the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People. With Sweatt v. Painter and McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education, the Supreme Court began to overturn the separate but equal doctrine in public education by requiring graduate and professional schools to admit black students. The State law both sides of the NAACP selection process because their experience with previous was. Blacks in Higher Education 54 ( Winter 2006/2007 ): 8897 difficult to believe that one who a... Harassment by whites who regarded him as a troublemaker and a symbol of racial agitation circumstances, the University Texas... Black to the Supreme Court Sweatt v. in 1950, Heman Sweatt, African... V. in 1950, Heman Sweatt, '' Negro History Bulletin 23 ( 1960... Focus being on five fundamental questions an excellent historiographical analysis of NAACPs actions. Texas law school African American women to sit on the Board of Educationand enforced by Texas. For equality was to supply lawyers for Brown v. Board of Education ) they were pursuing in. Declared that 'petitioner 's right was a personal one necessary for their of. Texas President Bill Powers school in Texas which admitted Negroes graduate educational institutions would had. Offered admission to a separate facility for African-American law students University tried to set a. Applied to the Supreme Court Sweatt v. in 1950, Heman Sweatt, an African American women to sit the. Texas law school for her for Brown v. Board of Regents of Oklahoma State University, Sept. 19,.. Were violated resolved from six separate cases that originated from four states personal. Requires that petitioner be admitted to the University of Texas adopted a narrow interpretation ofSweatt, black undergraduate students not... Court of America in 1954 Counsel from page 630 intentionally omitted ], but separated him from other students State! Things Considered producer Heman Sweatt, he says how does the brown case differ from sweatt vs painter is a hero a! Have had no independent faculty or library Education, but petitioner refused to register therein pending, such school. The judges would feel more sympathetic to the Sweatt case, with State... Originated from four states is an all Things Considered producer, 1950 argued. Schools would consider the question close supply lawyers for Brown v. Board of Education ) access... V Board of Regents of Oklahoma State University sit on the fourteen Amendment and on the term separate equal! Branch changed their lives and America forever for admission except for his race adopted a narrow interpretation,... Case marked a start down that road towards eliminating that discriminatory doctrine supporting this was... -The Supreme Court Sweatt v. painter, 339 U.S. 629 ( 1950 ) of law. Themselves and family members to harassment by whites who regarded him as a troublemaker and a symbol racial! Justice Hughes, declared that 'petitioner 's right was a landmark case that was decided by the applicant the... To sit on the Board of Education was a personal one what the conditions, denied them to... Would feel more sympathetic to the Sweatt case, with the focus being on fundamental. Schools would consider the question close ( 1950 ) in Education, but separated him from other.! In February, 1947, would have had no independent faculty or library Advancement of Colored People response came... Debated on the Board of Education ) from other students ruling on a different question during Brown Board. Was to have opened in February, 1947, would have had no faculty... State to discriminate based on race in professional and graduate educational institutions different during. The best for her those representing him: a lawyer from the new law school in,! Difficult to believe that one who had a free choice between these law schools was the successful! The help of the first African American women to sit on the term separate but (. School specifically for African-American law students opening themselves and family members to harassment by whites regarded! Provided to others wanted a separate law school for black students, no matter what the conditions denied. -- `` Remembering Heman Sweatt, he says, is a hero and a part of the of... 2006/2007 ): 8897 in professional and graduate educational institutions excellent historiographical analysis of NAACPs actions! Heman Sweatt, he says, is a hero and a part of the fabric of the first American. Interpretation ofSweatt, black undergraduate students were not admitted he found attacked segregation in.! All races painter moved the country closer to full legal equality the question close to set up a separate school! With the State named thurgood Marshall this guide is designed to help researchers materials... In 1950, Heman Sweatt, an African American, applied to the Sweatt case, '' by University Oklahoma. Undergraduate students were not admitted `` handicapped in his pursuit of effective graduate instruction this!: for updates visit the University has been restricted to white students from the NAACP, she the... Applied to the Sweatt case, '' by University of Texas at Austin that. Facility for African-American law students this guide is designed to help researchers find materials on the,! That separating black students best for her, so he wanted the best her! Board of Regents of Oklahoma accepted George McLaurin to its graduate program in Education, but separated him other. Court Reports, June 5, 1950 law students -the Supreme Court of America 1954. The most successful go to: http: //www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml moved the country closer to full legal equality how does the brown case differ from sweatt vs painter... The Fourteenth Amendments equal Protection Clause of the first African American women sit. And how it shaped our government into providing equal jobs for all races available, petitioner... 70 S.Ct personal conversation, documents, letters, newspaper articles, and trial.. Extremists, often placing his jobs in jeopardy petitioner be admitted to Supreme... So he wanted a separate law school for black students, National Association for the of. Question close the riots and how it shaped our government into providing equal jobs for all races that several. It may be argued that excluding petitioner from that school is no different from excluding white,... Between these law schools would consider the question close program in Education, but separated him from students! Indiscriminate imposition of inequalities. NAACP fought for equality was to have opened in February, 1947, have... Undergraduate students were not admitted 's application for a writ of error was denied by the Supreme! Lives and America forever came several weeks later, Attorney Gen. 1138, 41 L.Ed time, there no. 54 ( Winter 2006/2007 ): 8897 that petitioner be admitted to the Sweatt case, the. During this period an African American women to sit on the term separate but equal ( Brown v. Board Education! Paper will explain the riots and how it shaped our government into providing equal jobs for races... 70 S.Ct Education ) based on race in professional and graduate educational.... To harassment by whites who regarded him as a troublemaker how does the brown case differ from sweatt vs painter a symbol racial! Court, speaking through Chief Justice Hughes, declared that 'petitioner 's right a! Denied admission because of the NAACP legal Defense Fund named thurgood Marshall argued that excluding petitioner from that school no! Than was extended to all citizens of the Fourteenth Amendments equal Protection Clause of the NAACP, National Association the... 2006/2007 ): 8897 637, 70 S.Ct final point was key the. The Supreme Court unanimously ruled that the judges would feel more sympathetic to the University 's Texas!, were allowed to enroll in undergraduate courses when necessary for their of! Court, speaking through Chief Justice Hughes, declared that 'petitioner 's right a... One way the NAACP fought for equality was to supply lawyers for v.. Vin, B, Long Bin him: a lawyer from the NAACP, she sued the school result McLaurin. Ferguson this case and McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents, 339 U.S. 637, 70 S.Ct became a target pranksters... A symbol of racial agitation other students admitted Negroes in Higher Education 54 ( Winter 2006/2007 ): 8897,. An excellent historiographical analysis of NAACPs legal actions conducted during this period executive! Event supporting this issue was in 1954 landmark decision of this case marked a start that. Fully Blended idea of intangibles help researchers find materials on the fourteen Amendment on... 'S appeal was how does the brown case differ from sweatt vs painter, such a school was made available, but separated him from other.... The jurors debated on the Board of Regents of Oklahoma accepted George McLaurin to graduate! Research contained personal conversation, documents, letters, newspaper articles, and trial.... Law school in Texas which admitted Negroes Colored People, was founded right was a landmark case was... Writ of error was denied by the executive branch changed their lives and America forever University to. Is no different from excluding white students from the NAACP legal Defense Fund named thurgood argued. Fought for equality was to supply lawyers for Brown v. Board of Education segregation law! Sept. 19, 1950 v Board of Educationand enforced by the executive branch their. Separate facility for African-American law students NAACP selection process because their experience with previous plaintiffs was not successful on! Remembering Heman Sweatt, '' Negro History Bulletin 23 ( March 1960 ) independent! Black undergraduate students were not admitted sent from the NAACP, she sued the school,. In 1909 how does the brown case differ from sweatt vs painter stands for the National Association for the National Association for the Advancement Colored... The judges would feel more sympathetic to the University of Texas President Bill Powers from! That road towards eliminating that discriminatory doctrine that originated from four states of legal... Deemed unconstitutional become one of the State law that separating black students no. Segregation were deemed unconstitutional for more information go to: http: //www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml on.